Nowadays, the bickering has common trend amongst youngsters and married people. This has led polygamy and high divorce rates. Justify the response with your positive or negative views.

Over the past few years, bickering in society has augmented to a greater extent among youths and married people. This trend is likely to accentuate in the coming years considering the ground realities of the modern cosmopolitan world. This often makes way to broken relationships and polygamy. While some people think that it affects people in a positive way, others maintain that it impacts mankind adversely and further exacerbates relationships. In my opinion, it negatively affects human beings and hinders their survival.

At the outset, there are a number of reasons why arguing over minor issues often impacts the human beings negatively, but the most preponderant one lies in the fact that it adversely affects the children born out of that commitment. They often become lonely and both parents don't have time to look after them. As a tangible example, a research conducted by Yale University on broken family relationships has found 89% of the divorced couples indicated minor issues as the reason for separation, and the cases for the ownership of their children is still pending in court.

On the contrary, some people argue that it's better to get divorced than continuing with heated arguments and wasting one's life living with people whom they don't like. These proponents don't know the value of human relationships and the drawbacks of such unintellectual thinking far outweigh any meagre benefits it may proffer. How often we see in newspapers appalling reports of suicides and killings, which exposes the wrath behind it.

In conclusion, it is evident that engaging in multiple relationships and cheating on one another have negative impacts on the relationship and it is expected that individuals take cognizance of these facts and act for the well being of the society.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 342, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ome people think that it affects people in a positive way, others maintain that it impacts mankin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ten impacts the human beings negatively, but the most preponderant one lies in th...
^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ey often become lonely and both parents dont have time to look after them. As a tang...
^^^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...nuing with heated arguments and wasting ones life living with people whom they dont ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... ones life living with people whom they dont like. These proponents dont know the va...
^^^^
Line 5, column 185, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e whom they dont like. These proponents dont know the value of human relationships a...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, so, still, well, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19310344828 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80721001384 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.0329778722 50.4703680194 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0906105657898 0.242375264174 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0325360161698 0.0925447433944 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.031567633724 0.071462118173 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0509618553386 0.151781067708 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440371044358 0.0609392437508 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.