Outline why you have selected your chosen three university courses, and explain how this relates to your previous academic or professional experience and your plans for the future.
I have selected to pursue my master degree in clinical ophthalmology and vision research in three different universities: University College London
"Institute of Ophthalmology ", Glasgow Caledonian University, and University of Manchester "Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health". All three universities have an international reputation for the quality of their researches and teaching methods which will fill my current needs. I believe that with my determination, independence and communication skills I can successfully complete any of the three programmes I have selected.
As I have already completed my Egyptian master degree in Ophthalmology, and passed two steps of FRCS Glasgow, yet, I would like to expand my clinical knowledge through applying at this course as a practical training to prepare myself for the third part of FRCS which is an oral and clinical exam. Practicing the ability of analytical thinking and finding out the diagnosis in a professional way, is my target from this course.
On the other hand, scientific research is considered nowadays the backbone in any developing process. Unfortunately, research in Egypt is not well established as it is related only to the governmental hospital's universities. Having such an honourable history in research, I have decided to join one of these three universities for their world-leading with outstanding researches, something I am sure that it will have a great impact on the Egyptian future specially the medical one.
- Chevening is looking for individuals who have a clear post study career plan Please outline your immediate plans upon returning home and your longer term career goals 49
- STUDYING IN THE UK QUESTION 11
- Outline why you have selected your chosen three university courses and explain how this relates to your previous academic or professional experience and your plans for the future 51
- Chevening is looking for individuals with strong networking skills, who will engage with the Chevening community and influence and lead others in their chosen profession. Explain how you meet this requirement, using clear examples of your networking skill 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...RCS which is an oral and clinical exam. Practicing the ability of analytical thi...
^^
Line 4, column 376, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a professional way" with adverb for "professional"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... thinking and finding out the diagnosis in a professional way, is my target from this course. On t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s it is related only to the governmental hospitals universities. Having such an h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, third, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1288.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 230.0 242.827586207 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45955841451 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626086956522 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6551724138 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.5076609117 50.4703680194 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.0 104.977214359 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.75 20.9669160288 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.25397266985 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134515376972 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559468904972 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030976653244 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852200844551 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152378573301 0.0609392437508 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 12.6369458128 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.