Parents are responsible for the behaviour of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree

Children's behaviour cannot be predicted or assessed at any given point of time. Sometimes, it depends on the situation, kind of parenting but mostly it just can't be explained. Parents do play an important role in shaping the behaviour and morale of a child, but making them solely responsible for their child's action is somewhat irrational.

Since, child's upbringing is totally dependent on the kind of environment or settings their parents created for them, thereby, it is upto the parents to teach their child values and appropriate behaviour in various conditions. They are the only ones who genuinely care to teach on how their child can set good examples in front of everyone and how he/she can survive in the most difficult times. They also have this responsibility of inculcating certain beliefs and characteristics in the child, as he/she is actually the representation of his/her family and any intolerable behaviour directly pinpoints to the family's nature and their parenting abilities.

However, part of being a child is exploring, trying, questioning, testing boundaries and breaking rules. Due to this, parents can't fully control how their child is going to behave at certain occasions. They can provide as much guidance as possible, but the final decision lies at the child's hand, and it might not be what they were expecting. Moreover, there are lot of factors that are going to play on how child might behave - the media, their friends, entertainment, cultural expectations, social cues, etc. Also, everyone have their own likes and dislikes, and predicting their behaviour is quite challenging.

Hence, it can be concluded that it's quite unfair to treat parents totally responsible for their child's behaviour, as even child needs to understand and accept the social constraints and need to balance the thought process between learning, action and outcome.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...n, kind of parenting but mostly it just cant be explained. Parents do play an import...
^^^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...nd breaking rules. Due to this, parents cant fully control how their child is going ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 8.36945812808 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 20.9802955665 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86748495212 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576666666667 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.65517241379 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.6623309287 50.4703680194 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.25397266985 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167415701789 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672836654491 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582432483172 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12338104438 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610772718711 0.0609392437508 100% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.