Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples
Recently, the phenomenon of being legally responsible for childeren's act and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of parental responsibility is higly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that children activities can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the advantages of being legally responsible by parents can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of parental action, as well as children mindset, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered aggressive children. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both being legally responsible parents and parental roles apparently can be seen. Within the realm of science, the disadvantages of being legally responsible by parents might increase the consequences of the significance role of parents. Moreover, fundamental aspects of children social behavior could relate to this reality that the downside of aggressive behavior pertain to children mindset. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the major impacts of parental responsibility is correlated negatively with aggressive act. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of role models. To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the legally responsibility of parents for children's behavior far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of children social behavior prove the significance of aggressive acts, but also pinpoint parental action implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | jenifer | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | gupta-vikas | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | priyaavs23 | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | Jaskaransingh11 | 55 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75179856115 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29315122448 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586330935252 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6996163439 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.25 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.12807881773 48% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281125103175 0.242375264174 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104261367462 0.0925447433944 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614146545958 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211301795352 0.151781067708 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521724506679 0.0609392437508 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.