People emphasizing goverment to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicle the are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of people emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that an advanced transport system rather new road can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, a new road for the vehicle they are overcrowding the cities can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, building a new road for vehicles and transportation might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of overcrowding the cities with build new road and an advanced transport system far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
- What is the advantages and disadvantages of climate change? 88
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss or not discuss? 88
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads of facilitate car ownership? agree or disagree? 88
- What is your opinion on deducting marks on student's work if it is late? 85
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss or not discuss? 88
Comments
good
good
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7037037037 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27189469949 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637037037037 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.569566758 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.0 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304475136972 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101249492765 0.0925447433944 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105095863681 0.071462118173 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170880525833 0.151781067708 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652316379382 0.0609392437508 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.