People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of an advanced transportation system and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of a traditional transport system is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that government services can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, building new roads for vehicles can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of producing efficient cars, as well as eco-friendly vehicles, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the rate of pollution air in megacities. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both a clean environment and a free public transport system apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, overcrowding the cities might increase the consequences of governmental projects. Moreover, fundamental aspects of establishing online taxies would relate to this reality that the demerits of railway system pertain to transportation development. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of well-designed roads is correlated negatively with extending the public transportation network. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of public services.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of establishing a modern public transportation system far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of private cars prove the significance of an old-fashioned transport system, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-28 | ahmedmemon_93 | 82 | view |
| 2019-02-28 | ahmedmemon_93 | 75 | view |
| 2019-02-28 | ahmedmemon_93 | 11 | view |
| 2019-02-28 | ahmedmemon_93 | 75 | view |
| 2019-02-28 | ahmedmemon_93 | 82 | view |
- Do you think consumers should avoid the purchase of over-packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views with any relevant example pf your own experience. 88
- Some students work while studying. This often results in lacking time for education and constantly feeling under pressure 88
- For governments and organizations, what is a critical global problem and what is thesolution? 88
- What roles should governments, companies, and individuals play to combat climate change? 11
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make a better network for public transport orshould build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77454545455 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4468354153 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650909090909 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1337113328 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.333333333 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230818218704 0.242375264174 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688741917045 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434823998824 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123521672361 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0126759563526 0.0609392437508 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.76 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.