Polygamy has increased widely in recent years. What solutions can you brought forword to decrease this issue?
The problem of polygamy which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people calming that it is hazardous while others reject of this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my view from favoring the negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this arguments but the most important one stems for fact is that it is all about rules because rules are strict and pay the fine. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that every people face finial problems. Moreover, the relationship is not work than we can choose the multiply marriages way. Hence, it is apparent why many are in against this trend.
Steps to deal with this problem are many but the most significant ones are not complicated but accessible and practical. Furthermore, government should make the strict rules for all people. Moreover, should people sacrifice our life.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to the conclusion that the problem of polygamy can be successful addressed provided that the above stated measures are taken.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-11 | manpreet9999 | 72 | view |
- Polygamy has increased widely in recent years. What solutions can you brought forword to decrease this issue? 72
- Impact of television shows on society? 77
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of mass communication in the present modern world 89
- some people think that it is good to lay out for leisure time activities and other think that there is no need for any outlining 77
- Experience is more effective way to teach compared to books agree and disagree? 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...of reasons which will further elaborate this arguments but the most important one st...
^^^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...tionship is not work than we can choose the multiply marriages way. Hence, it is apparent w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1111.0 1207.87684729 92% => OK
No of words: 215.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16744186047 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66355325732 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 379.143842365 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.5017181826 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5833333333 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9166666667 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.25397266985 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140039042916 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479371610158 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394174455222 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0806065000615 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356043371568 0.0609392437508 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.