professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and should be oaid more than sport and entertainment personalities.to what extend do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of professional workers which make a greater contribution to society should pay more than sports personalities and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedure is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that paying more to important workers than entertainment personalities an be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the entertainment personalities should pay lower than professional workers provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, made high payment for professional workers might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with the vital issue. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the professional workers make a greater contribution far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues potential implications
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-14 | goli.mohsen | 88 | view |
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give them more practical training throughout their courses. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 88
- some people claim that public transport should be free of charge, while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 85
- professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and should be oaid more than sport and entertainment personalities.to what extend do you agree or disagree? 88
- Some people claim that public transport should be free of charge, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 88
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give them more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 497, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...orkers than entertainment personalities an be a plus, and I will analyze that thro...
^^
Line 1, column 497, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...orkers than entertainment personalities an be a plus, and I will analyze that through...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86194029851 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36648027814 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649253731343 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3921389779 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.818181818 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211874049922 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070762725001 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834017339762 0.071462118173 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11856145483 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697339846975 0.0609392437508 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 53.1260098522 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.