Destruction of the tourist place is one of the vital concern faced by the local government. Owing to the fact that of the rise in traversing, a plethora of vintage buildings and sites are getting destroyed which is irremediable.
One of the principal reason for the damaged architectures is that they were not built to accommodate such vast hordes of people. What we can do is that we can limit the number of sight seers entering the place. We can do this by increasing the entry fees which indirectly leads to inadequate people coming to the site as well as more money will be available for the restoration and conservation. For Instance, Gujarat Government has limited the number of visitors visiting to statue of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, which is the highest statue in the worlds in terms of height that not only lower the load on the statue on the contrary it also increases the scenic experience of the tourist.
Another solution that will be helpful is to provide more guards to protect the construction which can prevent intentional damage as most number of the people who visit historical place are not respectful and purposely cause damage. Guards can explain the obligation that needs to be understood by the tourist and should also alert them about the repercussion if protocols are not seriously followed.
To sum up, the offered solutions are advantageous to prevent the issue of damaged site as a result of tourism industry. Although they are not a highly effective solutions, they still help to reduce the defect that will obtain in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, well, for instance, as a result, as well as, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1304.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9022556391 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75883504112 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563909774436 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.9996774185 50.4703680194 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.4 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.25397266985 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181154095757 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655900714054 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653034437206 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100006804716 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347541956323 0.0609392437508 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.1260098522 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.