Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transportation?
If we have to settle on one particular thing that segregates contemporary men from primitive men, it has to undoubtedly be transportation. Some individual postulates that governments build more roads to allow more vehicle owners while disparate envisages that government should improve the network of public transport. This essay will canvass why system of public transportation must be enhanced by administration.
First and foremost, management should construct new roads to permit more automobile owners. More roads will solve the issue of private transportation overcrowding our network of roads. For example, in past few years the number of vehicle owner has increased four folds but the system of roads is still the same. Therefore, more vehicle owners should be allowed by making more roads.
On the contrary, government ought to develop the arrangement of community transportation due to salient causes. Public transport is affordable, eco-friendly and safe medium of traveling. For instance, pollution which is the biggest problem faced by us, can be controlled by improving public transport system. Hence, the network of public transport service must be reformed by government.
Transportation has brought mankind a long way and it will be interesting to watch the effects on future generations. In conclusion my opinion is that government should invest more money in enhancing the network of public transportation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-24 | Harjindersinghsran | 77 | view |
| 2018-08-24 | Harjindersinghsran | 55 | view |
- Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transportation? 77
- Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transportation? 55
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Studyvand employment distract one from another. To what extend do you agree. 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, so, still, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1220.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 217.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62211981567 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21970456463 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603686635945 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8753698201 50.4703680194 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.8461538462 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6923076923 20.9669160288 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.25397266985 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.595907923637 0.242375264174 246% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.200532278328 0.0925447433944 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.194715278876 0.071462118173 272% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.343490054116 0.151781067708 226% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122645618269 0.0609392437508 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.