Should heritage buildings be preserved ?
The importance of preserving heritage buildings, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of preserving the heritage buildings has sparked the controversy over the potential impact on building. It can be agreed that preserving heritage buildings is a wise decision. This essay will elaborate how preserving old historical buildings helps to understand history and how it is environmentally viable and thus lead to a logical conclusion.
Body-1
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why heritage buildings should be preserved, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that heritage buildings are a symbol of history and provide information about different cultures and its heritage, which reflect and shape beliefs, values and understanding of current and future generations. As an illustration, an understanding of the cultural heritage of different communities of the past not only encourages mutual respect for other ways of life but also helps in development of laws and social structures. Hence, it would protect extinction of beliefs by remembering through old buildings.
Body-2
Another key justification for upholding this notion is that historical building preservation is a practice of conserving limited natural resources, which is beneficial for the environment in the long run. As an illustration, redevelopment and restoration of heritage buildings reduce energy usage associated with demolition, waste disposal and new construction, and promotes sustainable development by conserving the embodied energy in the existing buildings. So, it is elixir idea to reduce energy usage which would be beneficial for next generation.
Conclusion
What has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of preserving historical buildings is prominent and the way it prevents further degradation of the environment should not be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-18 | saritha vemula | 77 | view |
- The environment we live in is in danger. What are the underlying causes? Who is responsible to combat this? 77
- unacceptable behavior 16
- Culture shock is a new worrying concern for few immigrants, what are the possible options to eradicate this issue? 77
- If you want to study particular area of climate change, which subjects will you choose? 88
- How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage? what problems it cause. 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.75862068966 313% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88028169014 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31799270346 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580985915493 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.1384640271 50.4703680194 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.818181818 104.977214359 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 7.25397266985 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.474129606345 0.242375264174 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176738067504 0.0925447433944 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137297348837 0.071462118173 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288205721245 0.151781067708 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0971105723002 0.0609392437508 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 12.6369458128 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.