Historical monuments and heritage sites which stands tall to tell stories of epics. These monuments are at the verge of vandalism due to increasing tourists. Tourism is indeed a boost for countries economy and it is subsequently important to preserve the monuments from all the ailments like pollution, natural calamities and natural deterioration of structures. All heritage sites needs to be adopted and taken for perseverance, By which we can ensure the durability of the structures for future decades.
It is nonetheless to say, the existence of the this historical monuments are inspirations for many young learners to study about arts, craft, archeology, science, traditions, social and epics. These primitive era structures are example of human civilization of past centuries. And it's every individual responsibility to safeguard these monuments. Governments should take necessary steps in providing a protection by imposing strict rules and regulation for visitors to avoid plastic usage in and around the heritage sites, avoid scribbling on walls, discourage Photography and impose strict penalties for those not adhering to rules.
On the other hand, identifying the structures which need an immediate external support against the natural calamities and exercising to provide the structural support should be done. Also structure which are prone to natural deterioration needs to be protected using chemicals. And another important thing is to educate the prominence of historical monuments in citizens and make them active partners in preservation campaigns.
Thus, in keeping in mind all the aliments heritage buildings are prone to, individuals as well as governments should preserve them which reinforced to undo the harms done by pollution, acid rains, and other chemicals over the years.
- The claim that animals have “rights” has been the subject of much debate since the 1970s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? Do you agree or disagree? 72
- The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn,and relearn” – Alvin Toffle. What do you understand from Alvin’s statement? Elaborate on your understanding and support your point of 77
- The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn,and relearn” – Alvin Toffle. What do you understand from Alvin’s statement? Elaborate on your understanding and support your point of 77
- Some people believe that confidence wins bigger games that knowledge alone cannot. Also, that accumulating knowledge makes no sense until one has the confidence to put it to use.Is it true that knowledge will help one win a struggle only if it is put into 77
- Should heritage buildings be preserved ? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: the; this
...is nonetheless to say, the existence of the this historical monuments are inspirations f...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... the structural support should be done. Also structure which are prone to natural de...
^^^^
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'aliments'' or 'aliment's'?
Suggestion: aliments'; aliment's
...s. Thus, in keeping in mind all the aliments heritage buildings are prone to, indivi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nonetheless, so, thus, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65567765568 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06801868728 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593406593407 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.0581348718 50.4703680194 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.666666667 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233084368006 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669373781307 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644935159729 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138892164964 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628617128992 0.0609392437508 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.