Some people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry, physics, and history should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking.
The importance of people having different views on what subjects should be included was always a debatable topic. Many people think that practical subjects provides more knowledge to students. Others reject this notion and believe that both academic and practical subjects are beneficial to students. In my opinion, later proposition appears to be more rational. The following essay would further elaborate both practical and academic subjects are equally beneficial with justifying reasons and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To start with, it is believed from various factors that learners gain more benefits when studying practical subjects. Firstly, as students are exposed to so many skills, they would be better prepared for their future careers. For example, if children are taught how simple machines work at school, they are more likely to choose career as mechanics later in life. Secondly, students could apply what they have learned through practical sessions after classes. The best example is that after students learn basic dishes recipe, they immediately start cooking for families at home.
On the other hand, I firmly believe that academic subjects are also held equal importance like practical for a variety of reasons. One of the most basic feature is that academic subjects creates strong solid foundation on which practical skills are further developed. To illustrate, teachers find difficult to explain how to fix home appliances if students are not well prepared with the fundamentals of electricity which could only be found in physics lessons. Another important value of academics, in order to get admission in top level university or college learners need to have good knowledge of academic subjects.
In conclusion, both academic and practical subjects have their own benefits for the children, but I believe that more emphasis should be given to the topics which will be truly worthwhile in real life. Schools should not stuff children will only theoretical knowledge.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-05 | neethujithin | 80 | view |
| 2019-01-20 | neelu sharma | 85 | view |
| 2018-12-16 | arami | 100 | view |
| 2018-09-28 | Alka | 80 | view |
| 2018-08-06 | Fiona Joanna Cruz | 85 | view |
- People are moving to urban areas from rural areas for better life. What do you think about? 77
- The traditional subjects are soon moving off in last year's. Kindly provide the solutions and ideas to save such subjects. 77
- Experience is a more effective way to teach compared to books Experimental learning or traditional learning in high school and university Which one do you agree is more effective 74
- Whether universities offer popular culture 89
- Nowadays the bickering has common trend amongst youngsters and married people This has led polygamy and high divorce rates Justify the response with your positive or negative views 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 513, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'dishes'' or 'dish's'?
Suggestion: dishes'; dish's
...mple is that after students learn basic dishes recipe, they immediately start cooking ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 313.0 242.827586207 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43769968051 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63586987948 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584664536741 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6286965941 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.375 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1875 7.25397266985 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303662220559 0.242375264174 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10056070213 0.0925447433944 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673756823915 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187281987085 0.151781067708 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348558556613 0.0609392437508 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.