Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it?

Human behavior is natural instincts of individuals in response to physical or emotional stimulus. Although it seems to be a bit absurd however if rules are emended, I believe a majority of humans would certainly try to change their behavior if the new rules requires it. Moreover, if not adhering to the rules will have challans or monetary loss, almost all humans would work on changing their behavior.

We work day and night for money and it is considered of utmost importance by all. Life without money cannot even be imagined as to survive in this world be it anywhere, you got to have money. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that one can change his behavior according to the law of that city or country.

So, if a change in law does not have financial implications it could lead to less or no behavior changes however if financial implications are applied, human behavioral changes are bound to happen. I could site the following examples.
In New Delhi, it was observed that the air pollution level is considerably rising and inhabitants were asked to commute by public transport or of possible employ car pool techniques. This was considered to be of no importance until odd even rule with challan was imposed. People tried using public transport and car pooling for commuting.

Overall, I profoundly state that human behavior could be changed by laws however, there should be some financial implications attached to the law as well. Traffic signals, over-speeding and others have significant challans involved and hence people try to adhere to these laws. If no financial implications would have been bound to laws, it would seem nothing in the world is organized and everything would have gone hay-wire.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...raffic signals, over-speeding and others have significant challans involved and h...
^^
Line 8, column 309, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
...hese laws. If no financial implications would have been bound to laws, it would seem nothing in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, so, well, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 301.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00332225914 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82398280173 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2905745652 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.571428571 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21428571429 7.25397266985 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267502575007 0.242375264174 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809885426793 0.0925447433944 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798052093691 0.071462118173 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137311267536 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063087277751 0.0609392437508 104% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.