Some people believe watching TV is harmful for children, while other believe it can be beneficial. Express your own opinion about it.
Recently, the phenomenon of some people belive and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of old people is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that young people can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, watching tv can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that single people, as well as working people, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered very important people. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both much people apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of young children, watching tv harmful might increase the consequences of small. Moreover, fundamental aspects of small child relate to this reality that the demerits of local television pertain to Digital television. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of black-and-white television is correlated negatively with live television. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of local television.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of beneficial far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of small children prove the significance of young people, but also pinpoint local television implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-27 | Parastoo0066 | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 373, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... Thus, beneficial ramifications of both much people apparently can be seen. Within ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58196721311 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21013369574 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647540983607 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7897726833 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246571539706 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756622931154 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579621345135 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126600902415 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425721740941 0.0609392437508 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.