Although such topic, in all likelihood, never will yield a consensual agreement, the constructive dialogue on experiential learning can lead to a thought-provoking discussion.
My view is that I believe experiential learning can work well in formal education, and I shall put my forth in this essay.
To commence with, there are a myriad of reasons in favor of my viewpoint, and one of them is that experiential learning makes students have the experience.
It is also important to note that when the government applies the experiential learning in high schools, it will improve the work society.
For instance, a study shows that experiential learning gains votes by 80 per cent when compared to their colleagues, and this shows the important of applying the experiential learning.
Thus, experiential learning is crucial for working well in formal education.
In addition, there are a few aspects of experiential learning that need special mentioning, and the most significant one is supporting the country’s economy.
It is vital to observe that while experiential learning applies in the high schools, the students will be well experienced.
For example, a recent research that conducted by Germany institute shows that 85 per cent of countries that apply the experiential learning in the high schools, its economy grows up.
Hence, experiential learning has proven its importance to both individuals and society.
In conclusion, I see equally potential evidence that supports the arguments that I have provided above, and hence I believe experiential learning is very important because it will work well in formal education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'will' and 'yield'.
Suggestion: will never yield
...Although such topic, in all likelihood, never will yield a consensual agreement, the constructiv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 31, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...s essay. To commence with, there are a myriad of reasons in favor of my viewpoint, an...
^^^^^^
Line 16, column 14, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent research'.
Suggestion: recent research
...ll be well experienced. For example, a recent research that conducted by Germany institute sho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49609375 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22469632397 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51171875 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 409.5 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.931034482759 537% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9524510776 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.909090909 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 4.12807881773 266% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381018574503 0.242375264174 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178732870686 0.0925447433944 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832651575681 0.071462118173 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178732870686 0.151781067708 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832651575681 0.0609392437508 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 69.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 62.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.