Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences Others however believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime Discuss both views and give your opinion

There is a conundrum among people about of whether criminals put it into the jails for long time to reduce the crime or use other ways. I will shed light on both opinions of the aforementioned statement and will further delineate it with plausible reasons followed by a reasonable opinion.

Commencing with those who claim longer prison is the best choice to reduce crime. A predominant reason is it will be the lesson for other victims. To explicate it, in this modern era, crime rate is increasing day by day among youngsters. Due to which they do not have fear to do any crime. If criminal do crime and the judge will punish them by giving punishment to spend their maximum life in the prisons then other intimates learn a lesson from it. To epitome, a survey was conducted by Mumbai University in 2019 has revealed that 70% crime was decrease by giving punishment to criminals. As a consequence, they feel guilty, and they set an example for others.

As far as I am concerned, I advocate in the favor of latter statement. The reason behind this, everyone deserves a second chance in their life. In other words, parents should aware their adolescents by giving knowledge regarding what is good or bad for them and also send them to the rehab center. To exemplify, it had written in the newspaper that rehabs center are the best to change the life of offenders. Therefore, government should organize seminars to aware individuals about crimes and show them a right path.

To recapitulate, I strongly believe that longer time prisoner is not the best idea to reduce the crime it is only a lesson. However, other ways are better as recite solve this problem for permanent by giving them a second chance.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, regarding, second, so, then, therefore, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72909698997 5.00649968141 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61336517165 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585284280936 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.38153347 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.375 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5625 7.25397266985 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 2.75862068966 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292804653736 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085065022248 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773474213077 0.071462118173 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186109009811 0.151781067708 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951042090665 0.0609392437508 156% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 12.6369458128 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.5310837438 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, regarding, second, so, then, therefore, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72909698997 5.00649968141 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61336517165 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585284280936 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.38153347 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.375 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5625 7.25397266985 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 2.75862068966 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292804653736 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085065022248 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773474213077 0.071462118173 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186109009811 0.151781067708 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951042090665 0.0609392437508 156% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 12.6369458128 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.5310837438 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.