Some people think that each family should have one car and encourage the alternative vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
There is an ongoing debate among intellectuals regarding the use of vehicles. In this regard, umpteen protagonists assert that everyone should use vehicles according to their needs whereas antagonists censure this notion. They profess that people should utilize the other transport systems. All the sides of this contention will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs in order to deduce the reasonable outcome.
People who opine that everyone should have their own vehicle substantiate their points by citing that it is the need of today’s life. Firstly, by having own car one can easily go anywhere he want with proper comfort. Secondly, if a person uses his own car, it would take a less time to travel anywhere. To prove my point, when a person want to go somewhere, he can use his own vehicle that take him directly toward his destination without unwanted any stop on road.
However, there is another group of people who profess; one car in a family is enough to make a life easy support their logic by saying that public vehicles should also be used. First, more than one car in family not only increases the congestion on road but pollution in environment also. Second, use of car in excessive ways can lead to unhealthy lifestyle. It is reported by the media that people who use car on daily basis are more prone to get obese and become less active. Moreover, if people use public transport, it would help the government to increase the income that can be used on more facilities for people.
At the end recapitulating the whole discussion, it is conceded by me that the use of cars should be decreased by people that can lead to many physical, social and economical benefits.
- In many countries young people have been living far from their parents from the time of studies, work till marriage. Do you think there are more advantages than disadvantages of this trend? What is your opinion? 67
- Some people think that each family should have one car and encourage the alternative vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 85
- The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books and they shouldn’t waste their limited resources and space on providing expensive hi-tech media such as computer software, videos and DVDs. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statem 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...g own car one can easily go anywhere he want with proper comfort. Secondly, if a per...
^^^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...on on road but pollution in environment also. Second, use of car in excessive ways c...
^^^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...t can lead to many physical, social and economical benefits.
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ysical, social and economical benefits.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 20.9802955665 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85223367698 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64057540895 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587628865979 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8601750807 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.857142857 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162376396375 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621011015627 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416675545693 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0968610304712 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029283217133 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.5310837438 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.