A recent survey has stated that some section of people opine that the advent of technology is contributing in more socialisation whereas others contradict it. In this essay, I will discuss both the views how modern technology has given rise to spirit of fraternity and will also give my opinion at the end.
To commence with, the advancement of technology has imparted a stronger virtual connection among people. Nowadays, it has become easier to contact with one another without physical presence. The burgeoning of Internet services has made our life easier. For example, nowadays people can easily connect with the help of different software apps like facebook and whatsapp which facilitate its users for calls and messages. In addition to this, general awareness among people has increased due to social media sites.The promotion of status updates and different posts in social media websites has helped in advertising or raising public awareness among its users. For instance, events are created or public awareness like "Save trees -Go green " are being posted on social networking sites.
On the contrary, there are some instances where technology is depriving from socialization. In this contemporary era, individuals prefer social media platform to communicate rather than face-to-face communication. Mostly, conversations are carried out through apps and consequently, people become less acquainted with their family and friends. To illustrate, Whatsapp communication are more popular these days in terms of messaging and calling which is mostly used to convey messages instantly. Furthermore, technologies have also adverse effects on individuals. People have become so much addicted to electronic gadgets that they are found to be constantly scrolling their phones without caring about their surroundings or society such as it has been seen that people are botherless for the incidents occurring next to them .
To recapitulate, technology is a boon as well as disadvantageous to society. It has positive impacts like setting up virtual connections and raising public awareness whereas negative impacts like it reduces direct communication and carelessness for surrounding vicinity. I believe that advantages of technologies on society outweigh its disadvantages.
- Writing task 1 (a letter)You have borrowed something from your friend for a party and unfortunately it was damaged. Write a letter to your friend to apologise and say– What and when did you borrow?– What happened to it? Why?– What do you suggest to 73
- Tourism has caused environmental problems in many parts of the world. What sort of problems has been caused and what can be done about them? 89
- Some people believe that teachers have a important role to play in the educational success, while others think it is the student's attitude that matters. Discuss both views and share your opinion. 73
- Shopping is now one of the most popular forms of leisure activity in many countries for young adults.Why is this?Is it positive/negative development?Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?------------------------------------------------ 84
- Some people believe that travelling alone really benefits in learning a country's culture and experience, while others believe it is better to travel with someone you know. Discuss both these views and share your opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 513, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...has increased due to social media sites.The promotion of status updates and differe...
^^^
Line 5, column 825, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...for the incidents occurring next to them . To recapitulate, technology is a boo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, so, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 31.9359605911 163% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1950.0 1207.87684729 161% => OK
No of words: 344.0 242.827586207 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66860465116 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 3.92707691288 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07278642003 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 139.433497537 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627906976744 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 379.143842365 164% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6773787283 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.705882353 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2352941176 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05882352941 7.25397266985 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161437794489 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465434313226 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492743374133 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10614482005 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831847809286 0.0609392437508 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 55.0591133005 216% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.