Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
Recently, the phenomenon of placing advertisement in the schools for public school and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the tv advertisements are highly beneficial, such issues are regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to belive that using the additional fundings is highly beneficial, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the universities funding sections standpoint, resource for public schools can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that commercial ads, as well as outdoor advertisemenst, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered industrial corporations.Thus beneficial ramifications of both N and N apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of children exploitation, children works might increase the consequences of captive audience. Moreover, fundamental aspects of classified advertising relate to this reality that the demerits of school programs pertain to private schools. As a tangible example, a scientific research was undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of advertising is correalted negatively with the tv advertisement. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of scholar poblems.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of corporating sponsers far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of commercial ads prove the significance of great resource, but also pinpoint additional funding implications.
- “More information available online so library books are useless.” Agree or disagree with statement? 85
- Are the cars damaging the environment? Should the number of cars be restricted to one for one family? Give your views and support your views with appropriate examples. 88
- Any recent Invention that you think proved beneficial or detrimental to society. 88
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. Choose which position you most ag 88
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
...hich discovered industrial corporations.Thus beneficial ramifications of both N and ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...hich discovered industrial corporations.Thus beneficial ramifications of both N and ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88537549407 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48440438403 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671936758893 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1028210072 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.363636364 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206046074445 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639895455503 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663558301433 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103090723309 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041554878619 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.27 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.