Some people would like to cook at home. Others prefer to eat at restaurants. Which one would you like? Support your answer with specific reasons.
The controversial topic concerning cooking at home never fails to attract public attention. There has been a heated debate on whether cooking at home can provide benefits to our society or not. In this essay, I shall elaborate on my point of view by analyzing both sides of the arguments before deducing a proper conclusion.
First of all, it is quite reasonable for me to believe that the idea of promoting survey provides several merits. The first point in regards to the issue is that the benefits of cooking at home have contributed to the advancement of the subjects; There are different kinds of cooking at home. There would be convincing examples to name but a few. As a result, cooking at home can be beneficial for both the old and new generations across the world.
In contrast, it is commonly known as the fact that cooking at home can benefit our communities. Nevertheless, this statement does hold water to some extent. Moreover, it should be pointed out that there are various advantages. such as there are different kinds of cooking at home. Furthermore, these examples can be significant factors that ought to be considered.
In conclusion, to sum up the aforementioned reasons, we may safely conclude that the positive impacts of cooking at home far outweigh the drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-11 | nezampoormohamad | 55 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...rovides several merits. The first point in regards to the issue is that the benefits of cooki...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Such
... out that there are various advantages. such as there are different kinds of cooking...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 1207.87684729 89% => OK
No of words: 219.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93607305936 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88034850283 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58904109589 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 379.143842365 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9325469316 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1538461538 104.977214359 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8461538462 20.9669160288 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3846153846 7.25397266985 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225241842486 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854047050032 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651734784265 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13955177033 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379361521684 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 12.6369458128 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.