It is undoubtedly true that the money spends on investigations should be used wisely. The question as to whether money should not be spent for researches in the space considering all environmental problems in our planet is a complex and controversial issue upon which opinion varies widely. This essay will discuss different arguments about the matter and will advocate valid reasons to show that knowing about the space results in a positive impact to the society even to the environment.
To begin with, The technology developed for space travel investigations have resulted in a benefit for the society. Furthermore, some of the technological resources used to combat the pollution of the environment have been the result of years of investigation, initially directed to the space investigation. As an illustration, nanochips have been used to purify the main rivers contaminated around the world. Therefore, money spends in the space is crucial for the wellbeing of society and the environment.
Nevertheless, some people adopt a different view and tend to believe that government can get higher benefits if this budget were used for taking care of the planet instead of wasting it in the space. Moreover, the amount of money spends on investigations to space is enormous compared with the destined to tackle environmental problems. For instance, the funds used for a single launch to space can be used to purify all rivers in the world. Hence, it is understandable why some people advocate this idea.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that although the amount of money spends in investigations is significant and it could solve many environmental problems. This essay has presented compelling evidence to support the idea that investing money to space investigation could result in a better benefit to the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: WHETHER[2]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
...n investigations should be used wisely. The question as to whether money should not be spent for researche...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...a benefit for the society. Furthermore, some of the technological resources used to combat ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, as to, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22895622896 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11153013634 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501683501684 0.580463131201 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.9 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5516536338 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.461538462 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300612439775 0.242375264174 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10773177967 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681279207393 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181268893233 0.151781067708 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538069957879 0.0609392437508 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.