Student travel to study is overrated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really required for higher studies?
Recently, the phenomenon of traveling for education has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “is travel a necessary component of educational progress?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that studying abroad is required for higher studies, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, traveling to a foreign nation is bound up inextricably with advanced tuition, which indicates they lead to both brilliant scholars and prestigious universities. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between academic progress and learning environment as well as an exponential increase in overseas traveling. Their academic criticism was impressive. Researchers, nevertheless, paid heed to multicultural education, international interactions, and wider opinion spectrum alike. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of expanding our horizons is correlated positively with not only diverse academic communities but also broader perspectives.
Within the realm of personal life, without the slightest doubt, visiting new cultures attribute to information sharing, in that it would come down to incredible new outlooks, enhanced interpersonal skills, and building personality. A salient example of such attribution is a scholarship program, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take self-awareness for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint confidence-boosting problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to international students, cooperative projects, and even teamwork. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of studying abroad.
Within the realm of characteristic traits, without the slightest doubt, studying in an alien environment attribute to alternative perspectives, in that it would come down to outstanding characteristics, socially skilled personalities, and extremely competent professionals. A salient example of such attribution is student-exchanging programs, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take well-motivated students for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint creative talents’ problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to character development, real-world experiences, and even practical training. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of studying abroad.
Within the realm of personal life, without the slightest doubt, international education attributes to strange surroundings, in that it would come down to immigration restrictions, language barriers, and a culture shock. A salient example of such attribution is foreign elites, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take homesickness for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint migration problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to exorbitant tuition fees, economic affordability, and even additional charges. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of negative aspects of studying overseas.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that travel is the necessary component of education. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover. Meanwhile, as a feasible solution, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
- Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well. Discuss your opinions and give examples. 77
- ATM machines 11
- In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well. Discuss your opinions and give examples. 55
- In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well. Discuss your opinions and give examples. 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, look, nevertheless, so, thus, well, whereas, while, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 10.5418719212 256% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 20.9802955665 186% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 31.9359605911 225% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 24.0 5.75862068966 417% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3443.0 1207.87684729 285% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 570.0 242.827586207 235% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.04035087719 5.00649968141 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88617158649 3.92707691288 124% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.5068573724 2.71678728327 129% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 139.433497537 201% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491228070175 0.580463131201 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1066.5 379.143842365 281% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.6157635468 238% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 1.56157635468 448% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 0.931034482759 859% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 3.65517241379 356% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 12.6551724138 221% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.415821091 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.964285714 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 7.25397266985 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.12807881773 145% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 6.9802955665 201% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 2.91625615764 309% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204210704724 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496749267395 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512224500849 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116032110447 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472945988019 0.0609392437508 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.75 11.5310837438 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 192.0 55.0591133005 349% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.