Students in school and university learn far more from lessons with their teachers compared to other sources, such as television or the internet. Do you agree or disagree?
Whether taking lessons with academics to be more beneficial in comparison with learning through television or the internet is a moot question. However, education in learning environment seems to have always an overwhelming superiority over learning from other sources despite the many benefits of which. This essay will explain why.
Firstly, students usually place a premium on studying under the supervision of pedagogical experts. If they prefer to take teacher-led lessons, it is because teachers often are well-educated not only in teaching procedures but in a particular field of study as well. This will give students the ideal opportunity to take in all lessons from the right sources. Therefore, they can greatly benefit from the interaction with their pedagogue and their peers in an academic environment meaning that they will be able to question whenever having a problem with the lessons or whatever vague. Likewise, the continuous assessment provided by teachers which in turn help them make steady progress in the learning process. Further and even more importantly, though, students will be able to select courses based on their interest fields. This can be seen, for example, at universities where a bewildering array of options ranging from theoretical courses to practical ones as well as well-rounded professors are available.
It is true that the importance of other sources such as television and the internet should not be ignored as they can be instantly accessible everywhere. Nevertheless, their functionality pales compared to the human-teaching method by which students could master far more.
Overall, to discriminate between learning sources, although television and the internet could play a complementary role in learning, it would appear that guided learning is easily the most functional and efficient procedure, by a significant margin.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-24 | Mehdi.Babaie | 77 | view |
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? What are the reasons for that? 88
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- Nowadays more and more people want to live by themselves. What are the reasons? Is it a positive or negative trend? 61
- In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages? 80
- Some people think that children should go to kindergarten before attending primary school, while others believe that is better for children to stay all day with their families. Discuss both views and give yoir own opinion. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for example, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56097560976 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05107927273 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620209059233 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5229042775 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.769230769 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.25397266985 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328785767438 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10079601163 0.0925447433944 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595539476884 0.071462118173 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187113094648 0.151781067708 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383027454914 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.