Is studying films as important as studying literature?
Watching films have become a virtually inevitable part of modern life since the movie was invented. Some people argue that films should be embedded in the curriculum as they are as vital as studying literature; opponents claim films are just wastage of time. I am profoundly inclined to believe that watching studying drama at school is as prominent as literature; thus, it can be utilized as a powerful education tool. The following paragraphs will further elaborate on the undeniable importance of drama for students and will lead to a plausible conclusion.
First of all, films provide not only children but also adults with a myriad of benefits, and the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that people can build stronger emotional connections with what they watch, but this is not always the case with literature because students consider studying literature as an obligation. As a result, they can relate to themselves better which stimulates student learning without boredom. For instance, the data yielded by a reputable high school in the UK in 2017 proves that students obtained higher exam grades when they learned literature syllabus through dramas than when they learned through conventional means.
Second of all, another key value of film in education is that it is a leveller and it has a universal language. For example, students can discuss their opinions about a drama even if they have learning disabilities, which will ultimately promote the development of their social skills whereas reading literature can be challenging which might hinder the learning process.
In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that films are as much prominent as literature in a school curriculum. It is expected that executive head teachers will take cognizance of this fact and include studying films at school as an option for pupils.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25752508361 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80689890208 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585284280936 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.8988958637 50.4703680194 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.909090909 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1818181818 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5454545455 7.25397266985 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269823232975 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966707095653 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709325036372 0.071462118173 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165603894522 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724196632201 0.0609392437508 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.1260098522 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.