films
Watching films have become a virtually inevitable part of modern life since the movie was invented. Some people argue that films should be embedded in the curriculum as they are as vital as studying literature; opponents claim the opposite notion. I am profoundly inclined to believe that film is as prominent as literature; thus, it can be utilised as a powerful education tool. The following paragraphs will further elaborate on the undeniable importance of films for students and will lead to a plausible conclusion.
First of all, films provide not only children but also adults with a myriad of benefits, and the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that people can build stronger emotional connections with what they watch than what they read as they use two senses at the same time, seeing and hearing. As a result, they can relate to themselves better which stimulates student learning without boredom. For instance, the data yielded by a reputable high school in the UK in 2017 proves that students obtained higher exam grades when they learned literature syllabus through dramas than when they learned through conventional means. Second of all, another key value of film in education is that it is a leveler and it has a universal language. For example, students can discuss their opinions about a drama no matter what social class or background they are from, which will ultimately promote the development of their social skills. Furthermore, they are a gateway to exploring unknown worlds of other people and complex ideas.
In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that films are as much prominent as literature in a school curriculum. It is expected that executive head teachers will take cognizance of this fact and include studying films at school as an option for pupils.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-11 | Basil3241 | 75 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | mndpsngh21 | 85 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | shyamsingh08 | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | sajid.uett | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | Rahul Luthra | 77 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lds of other people and complex ideas. In conclusion, the foregoing discussion ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10402684564 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72418951325 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610738255034 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7584428375 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.75 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.25397266985 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276300982032 0.242375264174 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123135519424 0.0925447433944 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921463532453 0.071462118173 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232247856086 0.151781067708 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104832230878 0.0609392437508 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.