Team sports are generally promoted as a great way to kip fit and build character. However, sporting events such as soccer matches are often accompanied by violence between rival supporters and other forms of antisocial behavior. If sporting events can lead to antisocial behavior, can team sports really be good for us?
Recently, the phenomenon of team sports and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of sports arena is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that violent behaviors can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, physical developments can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the sports science, as well as antisocial behaviors, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered physical injuries. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both extreme sports and soccer matches apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of social responsibilities, keeping fit might increase the consequences of building characters. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of football clubs is correlated negatively with young fans. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notions of young people.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of sporting events far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of rival supporters prove the significance of spiritual developments, but also pinpoint personal characteristics potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-26 | Ammu helen | 55 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | girlxxx | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | shyamsingh08 | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-31 | Sgms | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-26 | edsonsimoes | 55 | view |
- As a result of advances in medical care, average life expectancy is increasing for men and women. Do you think most people will see this as a positive development? What are the disadvantages of an ageing population for individuals and society? Support you 88
- 'Schools should prepare students for university, rather than for work.' How far do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations. 88
- Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed However others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments Can experimentation on animals be justified Are there any alternatives 71
- Involve employees in decision-making 11
- You have seen an advertisement in an Australian magazine for someone to live with a family for six months and look after their six year old child Write a letter to the parents In your letter Explain why you would like the job give details of why you would 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...s which are rooted in the fact that the sports science, as well as antisocial behavior...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 228.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78070175439 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34371651541 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.701754385965 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5042535548 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.818181818 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216156030619 0.242375264174 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657275286884 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527024858099 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106096892951 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460364616656 0.0609392437508 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.0 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.