Some people prefer to spend their holidays in resorts where everything is organized for them and they take little interest in the country they are visiting. Others prefer to travel around the country and to see how the people live, to get to know their cu

Recently, the phenomenon of some people prefer to spend their holidays in resorts where everything is organized for them and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that others prefer to travel around the country and get to know their customs and traditions and cuisine can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From a general standpoint, some people take little interest in the country they are visiting and prefer to travel around the country can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and complicated procedures apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of a public arena, others prefer to see how the people live and get to know their cuisine and traditions and customs might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of some people prefer to take little interest in resorts where everything is organized for them to get to know their traditions far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues potential implications.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 310.0 242.827586207 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42903225806 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01275298375 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 379.143842365 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.8767570642 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.0 104.977214359 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1818181818 20.9669160288 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.453629305012 0.242375264174 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135244765642 0.0925447433944 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148379133512 0.071462118173 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247232817808 0.151781067708 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659546687738 0.0609392437508 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 12.6369458128 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 53.1260098522 65% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.