Television has two roles to inform and to entertain. Explain which of these roles you see more important. To what extent do you think that TV today performs each of these roles in an effective way? Support your point view with details from your own experience, observation or reading.
Recently, the phenomenon of informing and entertaining as television' two important roles and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that being informing more important than entertaining by TV in an effective way can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, effective ways of informing and entertaining by TV in today's world can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of the public arena, comparison between being informative or entertainment about TV programs in an effective way might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creativity processes correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct that the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of comparing television' two important roles in aspects of being informative or entertainment far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-23 | neethujithin | 70 | view |
| 2018-07-31 | amirnaji24 | 88 | view |
- Involve employees in decision-making 11
- Some people prefer to spend their holidays in resorts where everything is organized for them and they take little interest in the country they are visiting. Others prefer to travel around the country and to see how the people live, to get to know their cu 85
- You have seen an advertisement in an Australian magazine for someone to live with a family for six months and look after their six year old child Write a letter to the parents In your letter Explain why you would like the job give details of why you would 73
- It has recently been suggested that the classical, or "dead", languages Latin and Greek should be re- introduced into the school curriculum. Those that oppose the idea claim that the ancient languages are of no practical use and no help in getting a job 88
- When computers first appeared on the scene, it was thought they would make us more productive inproviding goods and services, smarter and possibly happier. Skeptics claim that the opposite is true ascomputers have proved disappointing in terms of producti 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 434, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... more important than entertaining by TV in an effective way can be a plus, and I will analyze that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...tive or entertainment about TV programs in an effective way might increase the consequences of crit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.341135552 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.7591611204 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.0 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215025231335 0.242375264174 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728940741306 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623959715831 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123682266115 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308212979569 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 12.6369458128 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.