'Schools should prepare students for university, rather than for work.' How far do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.
Recently, the phenomenon of schools should prepare students for university, rather than for work and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that preparing students for universities not for work can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, rather than for work, schools should prepare students for university can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, preparing students for universities by schools, rather than for work might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of students at schools should prepare for universities not for work far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-12 | Krishn Patel | 85 | view |
| 2018-11-12 | Krishn Patel | 80 | view |
| 2018-10-18 | minapolo | 80 | view |
| 2018-10-18 | minapolo | 80 | view |
| 2018-10-18 | minapolo | 85 | view |
- When computers first appeared on the scene, it was thought they would make us more productive inproviding goods and services, smarter and possibly happier. Skeptics claim that the opposite is true ascomputers have proved disappointing in terms of producti 85
- Some effective people like repetitive routine such as eating the same food, do you like this way? Discuss your views. 88
- Some people prefer to spend their holidays in resorts where everything is organized for them and they take little interest in the country they are visiting. Others prefer to travel around the country and to see how the people live, to get to know their cu 85
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their family. Discuss. 88
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69402985075 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1667653469 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619402985075 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4293477574 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.727272727 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313712892445 0.242375264174 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115253681013 0.0925447433944 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942353536509 0.071462118173 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196544433582 0.151781067708 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283682760066 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.