Technological access to online music and the like should be free or paid. what do you think ?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in Technological access to online music. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain this easy.
There are a number of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that Technological access to online music and the like should be free can not only contribute to provide him to struggling singers and composes, so that they learned myriad things from new technologies but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages if offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say all these merits stand one in god stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follows such a system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility dedication and perseverance. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of technological access to online music and the like should be free.
In the view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of technological access to online music and the like should be free are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-20 | jagdeepkang | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be free are indeed too great to ignore.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92565055762 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88193534502 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546468401487 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.0 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.9721954956 50.4703680194 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.454545455 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4545454545 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29361769765 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122964367683 0.0925447433944 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153725551816 0.071462118173 215% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210083846996 0.151781067708 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.08051131314 0.0609392437508 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.