television has many useful
The importance of television has many useful functions to play in everyone's life which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people that it is claiming that beneficial reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the latter proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will be lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from fact that some its relaxation, for some it is a companion. Consequently, television has many useful to play in everyone life for some its relaxation for some it is a companion. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that television is very important of our life because give me news and children enjoy the cartoons and elder people enjoy the song, serial and movies. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that boys take the action supports games and cricket. Hence, it is apparent why many are against of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of television has many useful functions to play in everyone's life for some its relaxation are indeed too great to ignore.
- science subjects and mathematics. 61
- numerous prefer more fast food and snacks. 77
- xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the western countries 85
- Some people think that it is important to have a single language as an international official language. Others think that it will make it difficult to identify countries and cause a loss of culture. What are your opinions on this? 85
- human behavior can be limited laws 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1256.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.024 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7350319925 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 403.2 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7530535822 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.181818182 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 7.25397266985 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25411271835 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995655473648 0.0925447433944 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130532248527 0.071462118173 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169014074355 0.151781067708 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676222951129 0.0609392437508 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.