The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Recently , the phenomenon of threat of nuclear weapons and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the significance of complex procedure is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believed that providing cheap and clean energy can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, maintaining world peace provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that nuclear technology, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered envioroment effects. Thus, beneficial ramification of both pollution of enviroment and this remarkable phenomenon apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, nuclear threat of weapons might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with viatl issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this commom phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of proving energy far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpiont thorny issues' potential implications.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-03-03 PeetBains 55 view
2019-03-03 PeetBains 55 view
2019-03-03 PeetBains 55 view
2019-01-07 arami 85 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user arami :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
Recently , the phenomenon of threat of nuclear wea...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7280334728 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22896773581 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.690376569038 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4855345414 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.454545455 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17393196416 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568700649091 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634957428268 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0918967429883 0.151781067708 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223857522061 0.0609392437508 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.09 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.