Tobacco, mainly in the form of cigarettes is one of the most widely used drugs in the world. Over a billion adults legally smoke tobacco every day. The long-term health costs are high- for the smokers themselves, and for the wider community in terms of health care costs and lost productivity.Do Governments have a legitimate role to protect citizens from the harmful effects of their own decisions to smoke, or are such decisions up to an individual?”
In a rapidly changing world and era, there is an upward trend and significant tendency towards smoking tobacco. While there are certainly valid arguments regarding its negative consequences, it arises a question about what actions governments can be done in this regard. Therefore, in this essay, the primary reasons associated with this will be argued and focused on.
To commence with, a variety of reasons can be offered to explain why authorities play a crucial role to address this major problem. Foremost among these, I believe is being able to imposing much stricter laws in order to prevent individuals to smoke. Introducing new laws, to cite an example, perceived as being a preventative measure which would be able to control people’s temptation substantially. Hence, this makes it clear that why the role of governments is inevitably significant.
Further, another contributing factor is that importing such harmful products can be monitored and administrated by officials so that it is proved that this leads to curtailing respiratory diseases. Moreover, being exposed to tobacco, the respiratory systems of every member of the public as passive smokers are at risk of a lot of fatal diseases as lung cancer, heart diseases, and etcetera; nevertheless, people’s awareness rise by the mass media to a great extent. Thus, it can be said that the responsibility of these kinds of behaviors in societies should be controlled via both sides.
To recapitulate, I once again reaffirm my sentiment that not only are administration responsible for preventing and avoiding the negative consequence of smoking in societies but also when governments are accompanied by individuals this can have a positive impact on societies in terms of reducing the number of health hazards and other negative aspects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-01 | Rahul Luthra | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-01 | Rahul Luthra | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-01 | Rahul Luthra | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | Sidra018 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | edsonsimoes | 55 | view |
- With technology speeding up more and more young people begin to use mobile phones and the Internet but old people have little chance to be exposed to them What ways could mobile phone and the Internet be useful to old people How can old people be encourag 66
- The importance of travel seems to be over rated. Brilliant scholars locked themselves at home. Travel is important for education. To what extent to you agree or disagree. 77
- Tobacco, mainly in the form of cigarettes is one of the most widely used drugs in the world. Over a billion adults legally smoke tobacco every day. The long-term health costs are high- for the smokers themselves, and for the wider community in terms of he 11
- Nowadays young people seek older people s advice in the same way as in the past Do you agree or disagree with this statement Include your opinion and relevant examples from your own experience 78
- The importance of travel seems to be over rated. Brilliant scholars locked themselves at home. Travel is important for education. To what extent to you agree or disagree. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lth hazards and other negative aspects.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38111888112 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15089290039 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646853146853 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.1470324305 50.4703680194 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.909090909 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.25397266985 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.070150631091 0.242375264174 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0257245910588 0.0925447433944 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038951853922 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0459584584468 0.151781067708 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282052602821 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.