In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the supermarkets is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the mega malls can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the complex centres can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of being easy to access as well as being a convenience for purchasing, are inextricably bound up. According to my own example, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of having a large park space. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both saving time and having a recreational centre for children apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of social science, buying from large malls might increase the consequences of fulfilling the basic needs. Moreover, the fundamental aspect of the wrong infrastructure could relate to this reality that the demerit of requiring the vast area to construction is pertaining to putting much investment on building a large mall. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of expensive products is correlated with the imposition of a heavy tax. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of being so busy place.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of replacing the mega malls instead of local shops far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of having this opportunity to select our products prove the significance of a complex building, but also pinpoint practical implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-07 | baldeesh kaur mann | 72 | view |
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss the pros and cons. 88
- Some believe it is hard to keep the balance between job and private and personal life. What do you think? As per your opinion what could be the possible reasons for that? 88
- More information available online so library books are useless. agree or disagree? 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 88
- sports, playing in a team or individual? what are the reviews and possible solutions for that? discuss. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 307.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31921824104 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1056407054 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628664495114 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.1063557975 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.083333333 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5833333333 20.9669160288 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200869734324 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681840293174 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116110505168 0.071462118173 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121027271343 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0902691601999 0.0609392437508 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.