One of the most important trends in today's world is a sudden upsurge in the statement that traditional subjects are moving off. There is a widespread worry that this will lead to a myriad of concerns in the world. This essay will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the above statement, which relates to the fact that traditional subjects are moving off using a pragmatic approach.
To commence with, there are several arguments in favor of my stance. The most important one not only includes the betterment of the society, but also includes the positive development of every individual on the planet. Because of its countless benefits, not only can one gain more when it comes to being successful and effective, but they can also improve their efficiency, productivity and a quality of life with the great deal of efficacy and convenience.
Another crucial factor in the aforementioned statement is that it is only likely to assist one to flourish, progress and excel in a variety of fields and disciplines. Consequently, when an individual adheres to such a system, they can expand their horizons, skills and qualities such as dedication, commitment and perseverance. Hence, it is evident why many in favor of the fact that traditional subjects are moving off.
Lastly, in my opinion, the government of Australia is taking a great initiative in educating its citizens against the negative impact of the fact that traditional subjects are moving off. Citizens are being encouraged to follow its applicable laws as well as rules and regulations to promote prosperity, productivity, efficiency and a positive environment in the world.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: shreyanshpte
Essay Categories
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, lastly, so, well, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16104868914 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04268796204 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52808988764 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 449.1 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4805490518 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.272727273 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204880999343 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833305506157 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101925970751 0.071462118173 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126077992066 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803660656943 0.0609392437508 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.