It is an irrefutable fact that travel to study is overrated, in this contemporary world, has become an integral part of our society. Considering this scenario, whether we have local brilliant scholars or travel is really required for higher studies is a matter of discussion. However, this essay will ascertain both the sides before deducing a reasonable conclusion.
There are numerous reasons wherein the opinion that travel is really required for higher studies can be supported. To begin with, books everywhere are the same but teachers are different is a substantial factor to consider. In general it is seen that travelling adds extra expertise and knowledge due to diversity. Therefore it is a major factor. For instance, an article in The Age revealed that 80 percent of the students support this viewpoint. In addition, travelling for higher studies also adds substantial value to your career.
Despite the reasons discussed above, there are others who assert that there are brilliant scholars who have studied locally. Firstly, their belief that education level is the same everywhere, could be the most substantial factor to consider. It is commonly seen that intelligence is what matters in studying and not cultural exposure. Therefore, it is a major factor. Secondly, for career in yr own home country, one doesn't need diversity and expertise is another factor to consider.
In the end, indeed it maybe true that locally there are brilliant scholars; however, I am still opinionated that travelling is really required for higher studies.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: ghazal123
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 315, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...pertise and knowledge due to diversity. Therefore it is a major factor. For instance, an ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... for career in yr own home country, one doesnt need diversity and expertise is another...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 29, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'trues'?
Suggestion: trues
... consider. In the end, indeed it maybe true that locally there are brilliant schola...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for instance, in addition, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 10.5418719212 209% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1309.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 248.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27822580645 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82414415222 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576612903226 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3675557596 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2666666667 104.977214359 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5333333333 20.9669160288 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.25397266985 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401477783083 0.242375264174 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122215202968 0.0925447433944 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134447427002 0.071462118173 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235680587651 0.151781067708 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601027362417 0.0609392437508 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.