In under developed countries, tourism has disadvantage and can be said opposite as well. Give your opinion?
The importance of under developed countries, tourism which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in the recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will elaborate both positive effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that it is positive effect of under developed countries and tourism. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is fact that under developed countries and tourism is beneficial our rich people society. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However there some pitfalls that negate this argument which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming stem is fact that it is negative effect of under developed countries and tourism. Besides, the under developed countries and tourism is not beneficial our poor people society. It can be agreed that upside of is instrumental indeed. However it is has some various drawbacks as well. Hence, it is apparent why are against this trend.
According to a argument aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that benefits of under developed countries and tourism of instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, the potential drawbacks should be not overlooked either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...l these merits stand in a good stead. However there some pitfalls that negate this ar...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... that upside of is instrumental indeed. However it is has some various drawbacks as wel...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... are against this trend. According to a argument aforementioned above, one can ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32530120482 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78973989235 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 139.433497537 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510040160643 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 409.5 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.8107838962 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7142857143 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7857142857 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226247317147 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830473183308 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059446924705 0.071462118173 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152238594494 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034478495844 0.0609392437508 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.