In under developed countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said opposite as well.
Give your opinion.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in benefits of tourism in under developed countries. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that benefits of tourism in under developed countries can not only contribute to progress of the economy of a country but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas besides, only when one follows such a system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, dedication and perseverance. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of benefits of tourism in under developed countries.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of tourism in under developed countries are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-30 | arshdeepsingh2000 | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | Jaskaransingh11 | 79 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1232.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.928 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81595454509 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.0 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.3288160563 50.4703680194 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.2 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.25397266985 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175792625572 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789235502112 0.0925447433944 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808883004597 0.071462118173 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12102597682 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261102557617 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.