“In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed’: Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples.

Essay topics:

“In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed’: Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples.

In this day and age, common people are suffering from the conflict of opinions. Although some individuals are of the opinion that citizens do not deprive of their rights, I am of the opinion that innocent people are exposed to dangers.
To begin with, there are some reasons that I argue that common individuals are suffering from groups ideology. First and foremost is that conflicts of opinions can lead to loss of liberty. Secondly, it is occasionally argued that human rights are attributed to selfish groups. From my experience, when I was young, a violent war began in my country. Consequently, it is quite conspicuous that citizens can be affected by the idea of other assemblies.
Moreover, there is no doubt that groups ideology can provide many persons with various negative outcomes. Despite this possibility, it is highly claimed that common people's health can be affected by the decision of policymakers. By way of example, a recent academic research conducted by Oxford University researchers in 2012 has shown that many Japanese people became blind as a result of a bomb. Thus, it is quite clear that the health of common man can be influenced by other decisions.
To put it in a nutshell, while some people argue that common people are not suffering from ideology, I am of the idea that they could be influenced by selfish decisions.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-27 yasamin.gharib62 88 view
2019-09-13 Alireza.r.68 11 view
2019-09-13 Alireza.r.68 11 view
2019-08-09 Anand_DD 80 view
2019-07-27 Sidra018 80 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user mohseny :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...ility, it is highly claimed that common peoples health can be affected by the decision ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, no doubt, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1125.0 1207.87684729 93% => OK
No of words: 228.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93421052632 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79180017183 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 139.433497537 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539473684211 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 357.3 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.546298852 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.75 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.25397266985 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 2.75862068966 362% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183932067105 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069222742259 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569017489671 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117100918892 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168233923137 0.0609392437508 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.