Recently, the phenomenon of inventing new devices in recent century and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many the matter of creating technology solutions is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that alternative medicine can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, inventing personal computers can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of creative invention, as well as technology development, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the greatest invention. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both discovering new drugs and designing airplane apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the invention of beneficial antibiotics might increase the consequences of cheap tablets. Moreover, fundamental aspects of inventing medical devices could relate to this reality that the demerits of international discovery pertain to breakthrough prize. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of technology process is correlated negatively with registering computer models. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of medical industry changes.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of invention development far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of patenting the invention prove the significance of technology reform, but also pinpoint invention implications.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: ankur_21
Essay Categories
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89272030651 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30770080304 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670498084291 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0663331999 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.166666667 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0687607354358 0.242375264174 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0241480818607 0.0925447433944 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.027245288254 0.071462118173 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0425498752082 0.151781067708 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257914468052 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.27 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.