What is your idea about lazy journalism that is commonplace in the digitalized world? Give examples.
Recently the phenomenon of lazy journalism and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of unfair journalism is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both destructive and negative by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that spreading fake news can be a downside, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the digitalized world can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of honesty, as well as journalism, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experiment, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the negative effects of dishonesty in news coverage. Thus, the detrimental ramification of both the digitized globe and incorrect news diffusion apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, journaling fake news might increase the consequence of the negative effects of the digitized world. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of news fabrication could relate to this reality that the demerits of lazy journalism pertain to the digitalized world. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the electronic world is correlated negatively with false news spreading. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of reporting unfair statements.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on the both sides, I profoundly believe that detriments of lazy journalism far overweigh its benefits. Not only do the disadvantages of dishonest broadcasting prove the significance of the digitized world, but also pinpoint the digital journals implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 478, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...d negatively with false news spreading. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceiv...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63099630996 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24085250474 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608856088561 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7773896421 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.166666667 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 6.9802955665 14% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 2.75862068966 362% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196005916591 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741964177869 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064945988391 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123394899397 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557209046635 0.0609392437508 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.38 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.