Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? Or experience is more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.
In today’s technological era, traditional learning methods are replaced by experimental learning. As per saying, “If you want to learn something, before you do it, learn it by doing it”. Some people believe that experimental learning should be part of formal education and curriculum as they are more effective while others argue that old academia better promotes the learning environment. This essay will discuss that why experimental learning is more productive way of learning and much needed.
Firstly, there are myriad of arguments to support experimental learning. Experiment and practical are basically help students to comprehend and grasp the subject’s idea quickly and easily than conventional learning. For example: Medical students will get better understanding of human body if demonstrated with experimental examples instead of just stick to theoretical knowledge. Therefore, experimental learning methodology is evolving and accepted at a very fast pace to provide students better and high-level clarification.
Secondly, experimental learning is help students to broaden up their horizon and cognitive skills because it’s convenient and flexible. It’s not only ignited the cognitive and intellectual skills but also a real-time scenario is generated which allow them to get ready with necessary precautions. For instance: only chemistry experiment tells students that which reaction and solution are required more precautions while performing in laboratory. As a matter of fact, due to its ease of adaptness there seems no plausible reasoning that why experimental leaning should not be introduce.
In conclusion, the forgoing discussion propounds the view that experience and experimental leaning is far better than old rote technique as it clarifies the concept. So, in my opinion, experimental learning should be an integral part of all academic systems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-18 | raminolfati | 85 | view |
- A recent study has shown that over 50% of school children cannot write legibly. The researchers concluded that the widespread use of smartphones, tablets and computers by children from as young as 12 months old was to blame. We are now living in a “post 77
- Communication has changed significantly in the last ten years. Discuss the positive and negative impacts of this change.Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience. 88
- The belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices. How far you support this view? Give your response with justification. 85
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. 80
- More information is available online these days the value of printed books has diminished Agree or disagree 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'parted'?
Suggestion: parted
...ve that experimental learning should be part of formal education and curriculum as t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'helped'.
Suggestion: helped
... Experiment and practical are basically help students to comprehend and grasp the su...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88848920863 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21737405065 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622302158273 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5877322831 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.928571429 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.25397266985 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172498486566 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629372710679 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448812301622 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103184855946 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504808654448 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.