Speaking topics in text
Keep or not the old building in the city?
Speaking recording
Votes
This speaking topic by users
| Post dates | Users | rates | Contents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-03 | Elena Cristina | 70.00 | Check this speaking |
Speaking category
Speakings by user Elena Cristina
:
- Talk about a book you have read that was important to you for some reason. Explain why the book was important to you. Give specific details and examples to explain your answer. 88
- Talk about someone you respect. 70
- Using points and examples from the talk, explain the difference between active and passive attention. 90
- Using points and example from the lecture, explain two ways weathering occurs. 78
- Briefly summarize the problem the speakers are discussing. The state which solution you would recommend. Explain the reasons for your recommendation. 65
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 404.0 444.711560045 91% => OK
No of words: 104.0 116.580246914 89% => More words wanted. You may: choose simpler words or speak faster or remove hesitations or remove long pauses, and fully use the time, do NOT save one or two seconds.
Chars per words: 3.88461538462 3.81502700369 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.19343686757 3.28032121604 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.71703956043 1.8723322822 92% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 76.076318743 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.740384615385 0.655143326166 113% => OK
Syllable count: 126.9 141.574747475 90% => OK
Avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.21358024691 99% => OK
Performance on coherence:
Topic speech coherence ratio: 0.0 0.0738818816272 0% => It may have issues on recording quality or the content is not so closely related to content.
Acoustic performance on paragraphs:
How many acoustic paragraphs: 2.0 3.20202020202 62% => OK
Average paragraph length: 52.0 60.3232687746 86% => OK
STD paragraph length: 3.0 17.3634065801 17% => OK
Average paragraph duration: 21.57 22.9064221017 94% => OK
STD paragraph duration: 0.63 6.49597621602 10% => The duration of acoustic paragraphs keeps same.
Acoustic performance on sentences:
How many acoustic sentences: 32.0 31.1548821549 103% => OK
Average acoustic sentence length: 3.25 4.0588447711 80% => OK
STD acoustic sentence length: 2.38484800354 3.18357895611 75% => OK
Average acoustic sentences duration: 1.296875 1.46810986539 88% => OK
STD acoustic sentences duration: 0.989537257699 1.01537252472 97% => OK
Acoustic performance on acoustic silence:(An acoustic silence means a little pause between two or more words)
How many acoustic silence: 32.0 28.6644219978 112% => It means the content is not pronounced smoothly or it is pronounced slowly. It is word by word.
Total acoustic silence duration: 5.74 5.28593714927 109% => OK
Average acoustic silence duration: 0.179375 0.187982170178 95% => OK
STD acoustic silence duration: 0.17832444974 0.154715141812 115% => OK
Acoustic performance on acoustic words:
Total word duration: 34.22 35.408047138 97% => OK
Average word duration: 0.329038461538 0.306236595465 107% => OK
STD word duration: 0.195396634246 0.198589292138 98% => OK
Disfluencies: like hesitations, or 'ehn' or taking a long time to pronounce a word:
How many disfluencies: 7.0 6.3164983165 111% => OK
Total_disfluencies_duration: 6.06 5.14435465769 118% => OK
Total acoustic noise duration: 1.75 2.80480359147 62% => OK
Acoustic rates:
Total speech duration: 43.14 45.0716498316 96% => Talk more. Do not save time. People can talk 4-5 words in one second.
Compare to expected duration: 0.958666666667 1.00159221848 96% => OK
Rate of silence: 0.74177097821 0.637764685501 116% => OK
Rate of speech: 2.41075567918 2.58495923209 93% => OK
Rate of speech by unique words: 1.78488641632 1.68816559523 106% => OK
Rate of word duration by unique words: 2.25014611338 2.15290372801 105% => OK
Average articulation rates: 0.369794076923 0.343871460585 108% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by speech e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the speech e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas.