TPO 44 - Question 3
Create Student Committee to Decide Funding for Student Organizations
I think students should be in charge of deciding which student organizations (for example, the jazz band or the hiking club) receive money from the university. Students should also be in charge of how much money each organization receives. A special committee made up of students could be created to make these decisions. Currently, these funding decisions are made by university administrators, but a student committee would know better than the administrators which organizations are most important to students and most deserving of the university's financial support. I’m sure a lot of students would be interested in serving on the committee, and those who do serve will gain valuable leadership experience.
Explain how the example in the lecture illustrates the concept of scope creep.
| Post dates | Users | rates | Contents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-19 | Seema Modak | 83.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2017-09-28 | ajulyav | 81.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2019-11-10 | bishoy | 90.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2019-11-10 | bishoy | 90.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2017-01-26 | hipax | 75.00 | Check this speaking |
- TPO 42 - Q2Some people prefer living in a big city. Other people prefer living in the countryside, away from urban areas. Which do you think is better? Explain why using specific details in your explanation. 83
- Some people like to watch television news programs every day while others like to watch them only now and then Which do you prefer Include details and examples to support your explanation 53
- TPO 37 - Q2Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Students will learn more if the teacher is kind and friendly.Use specific examples and details to support your opinion. 83
- TPO44 Q4Explain how the example in the lecture illustrates the concept of scope creep. 66
- tpo25q1Students often want to get better grades in their classes. Explain what students should do in order to improve their performance in a class. 66
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 751.0 593.389002037 127% => OK
No of words: 203.0 154.784114053 131% => OK
Chars per words: 3.69950738916 3.82920900774 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.52088357496 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.61987342256 1.81998168104 89% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 93.7942973523 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.608046397892 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Syllable count: 230.4 185.724439919 124% => OK
Avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.20224032587 91% => OK
Performance on coherence:
Topic speech coherence ratio: 0.0634247331501 0.0833886788687 76% => OK
Acoustic performance on paragraphs:
How many acoustic paragraphs: 1.0 3.90020366599 26% => Need more acoustic paragraphs.
Average paragraph length: 203.0 71.3690273242 284% => The average paragraph length is high.
STD paragraph length: 0.0 24.1299301424 0% => OK
Average paragraph duration: 59.06 26.8388033085 220% => Need to control the rhythm of the speech
STD paragraph duration: 0.0 8.89323425527 0% => The duration of acoustic paragraphs keeps same.
Acoustic performance on sentences:
How many acoustic sentences: 23.0 40.266802444 57% => Need more acoustic sentences. Maybe the speech rate is too fast.
Average acoustic sentence length: 8.82608695652 4.20756893501 210% => The average length of sentences is long.
STD acoustic sentence length: 8.12217669429 3.23972648638 251% => The length of acoustic sentences changes so often.
Average acoustic sentences duration: 2.56695652174 1.51236819293 170% => OK
STD acoustic sentences duration: 2.1228967797 1.0352206224 205% => The duration of acoustic sentences changes so often.
Acoustic performance on acoustic silence:(An acoustic silence means a little pause between two or more words)
How many acoustic silence: 22.0 37.9022403259 58% => OK
Total acoustic silence duration: 1.42 7.22384928717 20% => Still need a very little pause between two words.
Average acoustic silence duration: 0.0645454545455 0.193825474362 33% => Maybe the speech rate is too fast.
STD acoustic silence duration: 0.059827575941 0.16431695912 36% => OK
Acoustic performance on acoustic words:
Total word duration: 54.76 46.6644602851 117% => OK
Average word duration: 0.269753694581 0.304040633073 89% => OK
STD word duration: 0.139204065479 0.193491353168 72% => OK
Disfluencies: like hesitations, or 'ehn' or taking a long time to pronounce a word:
How many disfluencies: 6.0 8.88594704684 68% => OK
Total_disfluencies_duration: 4.53 6.97134419552 65% => OK
Total acoustic noise duration: 0.62 3.21433808554 19% => Good job. The lower, the better.
Acoustic rates:
Total speech duration: 59.06 59.1375356415 100% => OK
Compare to expected duration: 0.984333333333 0.985625594026 100% => OK
Rate of silence: 0.37250253979 0.643888735843 58% => OK
Rate of speech: 3.43718252624 2.61565628039 131% => OK
Rate of speech by unique words: 1.8963765662 1.58604529434 120% => OK
Rate of word duration by unique words: 2.04528853178 2.01333574461 102% => OK
Average articulation rates: 0.373628995074 0.322651457988 116% => OK
---------------------
It may have duplicated content. Need to use the words more efficiently.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by speech e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the speech e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas.