A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Social Contract is nothing but a set of invisible rules which are imposed upon the society. It is basically a set of rules which helps to avoid conflict among people and helping in retaining peace and harmony in the society. Hence, any person who has committed a crime has definitely broken the social contract, but not allowing him to retain civil rights would be wrong.
When a person commits a crime knowingly, he is very much aware of the consequences that follow after his action. But in spite of that, he decides to commit the crime. What is important to note here that a person when willfully commits a crime, there is something major that is at play, which is driving him to commit the crime. Most of the reason can be attributed to some sort of revenge. A person when is determined to have a revenge, even the most dire consequences of the punishment does not deter him from moving ahead in executing the crime. Thus, in this case not allowing him to retain any civil rights or right to benefit from his own labor would be wrong, because it is very much important to understand the reason for his revenge. No matter how much social contract is in the society there is always an inequality in the society. After the 9/11 attack in US, muslims who were even under a little bit of suspicion, they were detained by the investigation agencies and were tortured for long duration even when they were innocent citizens. Moreover, even when they were found innocent they were still continuously subjected to third degree torture even upto a month and in addition devoid of any civil right. Thus, when these innocent finally become free they are very disturbed and their faith upon the social contract and civil rights are destroyed and all they wish to seek is revenge. Hence, in this case when this person commits the crime with full conscience, and then he is devoid from his civil rights, it will make him even more alienated from the society and thus this will reinforce the violent behavior of the convict. Thus, the reason behind the commitment of crime is a very important factor before trying to snatch the person's civil rights.
Another example would be the people who are serving in the army. When they attack on another country they are doing so in their full conscience. Hence, if they are captured by the enemy then they can make him devoid of civil rights and torture him to the worst possible extent, however that is generally not the case. In fact, an United Nations convention states that even if an army personnel or soldier is captured by the other country, he still retains the basic civil rights which are set by the United Nations. In addition, this convention is agreed by a majority of countries. Hence, the notion of alienating a person of his civil rights just because he has committed a crime knowingly without trying to find the reason would be wrong.
However, there are also cases in which a person knowingly commits a crime for no good intentions. A simple illustration would be the persons who commits rapes. These people who commit rape have only one intention that is to fulfill their sexual desire. Hence, in these cases the person should not be given any civil rights whatsoever.
Hence, in short, it is wrong to snatch a person's civil rights without doing a research in finding the motivational force. Thus, rather than making an outcast from the society, it is important to introspect the other parameters of the crime.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 901, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ck in US, muslims who were even under a little bit of suspicion, they were detained by the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...hat is generally not the case. In fact, an United Nations convention states that e...
^^
Line 9, column 40, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
... Hence, in short, it is wrong to snatch a persons civil rights without doing a research i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 77, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...ch a persons civil rights without doing a research in finding the motivational force. Thus...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'third', 'thus', 'in addition', 'in fact', 'in short', 'sort of', 'in spite of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.209337349398 0.240241500013 87% => OK
Verbs: 0.168674698795 0.157235817809 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0813253012048 0.0880659088768 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0707831325301 0.0497285424764 142% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0527108433735 0.0444667217837 119% => OK
Prepositions: 0.100903614458 0.12292977631 82% => OK
Participles: 0.0481927710843 0.0406280797675 119% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.4033061101 2.79330140395 86% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0271084337349 0.030933414821 88% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.125 0.0997080785238 125% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0150602409639 0.0249443105267 60% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0346385542169 0.0148568991511 233% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3468.0 2732.02544248 127% => OK
No of words: 608.0 452.878318584 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70394736842 6.0361032391 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9656475924 4.58838876751 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.338815789474 0.366273622748 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.207236842105 0.280924506359 74% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.136513157895 0.200843997647 68% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0838815789474 0.132149295362 63% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4033061101 2.79330140395 86% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 219.290929204 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.417763157895 0.48968727796 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 50.2134828786 55.4138127331 91% => OK
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6194690265 131% => OK
Sentence length: 22.5185185185 23.380412469 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6538591133 59.4972553346 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.444444444 141.124799967 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5185185185 23.380412469 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.62962962963 0.674092028746 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 43.242202729 51.4728631049 84% => OK
Elegance: 1.22680412371 1.64882698954 74% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458086767074 0.391690518653 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.142413704326 0.123202303941 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0894848003956 0.077325440228 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.495294662662 0.547984918172 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.113261702688 0.149214159877 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173858271691 0.161403998019 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797145038393 0.0892212321368 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.380854237532 0.385218514788 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.145885873162 0.0692045440612 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312213460988 0.275328986314 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534427214783 0.0653680567796 82% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 19.0 5.30420353982 358% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 7.22455752212 42% => OK
Negative topic words: 14.0 3.66592920354 382% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.