Should children be allowed to play violent video games

Essay topics:

Should children be allowed to play violent video games?

As denizens have now entered in this most advanced contemporary era, video games are the platform, where children get a lot of pleasure out of playing that type of games. What these essay covers is how the cons occur if children are permitted to play video games, which pertain to crime. Personally, if I would have to give permission to children for playing a crime-related video game, then I would certainly reject it.

To engender with, certainly with some intension whether they are splendid or awful, violent video games are uploaded. First and foremost, as all things ranging from sniper to dreadful crossbows are included, the child uses them for killing their enemy in that violet video games. Nevertheless, it is unnecessary for them because the knowledge of how to use weapons is contributed to those games. Consequently, that rigid weapons may be opted by a child to devote the destination of a crime. For example, a survey conducted by IIM. More than 20% of young individuals had killed their parents owing to the permission of not playing video games. Eventually, it is proved to be disadvantageous to play violent video games.

In addition, children should not be authorized to violent video games. The reason being, in many of that video games, there are levels excluded. Many levels intend a huge chunk of time to be completed, thus the quality of children times can be invested to play that violent video games. As a consequence, they will soon become weak at either their study or work. For instance, Pubg is a video game, which has demanded almost 7 per day to complete one level. This total wastage of period and that time should be allocated in study instead. Ultimately, if children are entitled to play violent video games, then this may result exceedingly worst, be it in study or work.

In conclusion, what I reckon when it comes to giving an allowance to play crime-related video games? I completely prefer not to devote that permission, due to some negatives. Be it, wastage of time and dreadful impact on whether study or work or evolving disastrous skill in children.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, i reckon, in addition, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.6327345309 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 28.8173652695 101% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 2260.96107784 77% => OK
No of words: 358.0 441.139720559 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88826815642 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72985498449 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 204.123752495 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530726256983 0.468620217663 113% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 705.55239521 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1451396015 57.8364921388 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.5 119.503703932 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 23.324526521 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.70786347227 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 6.88822355289 218% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.491478328482 0.218282227539 225% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148291642162 0.0743258471296 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123722947628 0.0701772020484 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292191870997 0.128457276422 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795761371481 0.0628817314937 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.3799401198 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.3550499002 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.197005988 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.5979740519 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 98.500998004 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.