You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
"The table shows the percentage of journeys made by different forms of transport in four countries, The bar graph shows the results of a survey into car use.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The table gives the percentage of trips made by using different modes of transportation in four different nations namely in Canada, Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands. The Bar Chart presents the reasons given by the commuters in Canada why they travel by car. Overall, it can be seen that car is the most used means of transport in all the four countries and most of the travellers in Canada have opined that they do not have any alternative means of transport than car.
From the table, it can be deciphered that majority of journeys (that is 90%) in Canada involved car whereas, the car was used in slightly less than half of the travels (that is for 47%) in the Netherlands. Therefore, it is obvious from the table that the least amount of journeys was made by car in the Netherlands than the journeys by car in other three countries.
In Germany, little more than two-thirds of journeys (that is 68%) involved car and in Belgium, the figures show that car was used for making almost three-quarters of the travels.
Another glaring revelation that the table makes is that bicycle is quite popular in the Netherlands and stands at the second place in terms of its use. A little more than a quarter journeys (that is 26%) were made on bicycle in the Netherlands. In sharp contrast to the figures from the Netherlands, very insignificant amount of journeys were made which involved bicycle in other three countries.
As further can be seen from the table, the public transportation was the second preferred mode for travelling in Germany and in Belgium. When it comes to Canada, more journeys were made on foot than by public transportation. Almost one-fifth journeys in the Netherlands were on foot whereas in Germany and in Belgium, the figure was around one-tenth.
Coming to the analysis of bar chart, it can be seen that it provides reasons behind choosing car to travel in Canada. Little more than a third of people surveyed said that there is simply no other alternative. Slightly more than one-fifth of respondents thought that it was due to convenience in travelling. Marginally less than a third of population who answered the question responded that it is due to need of the job rather than the choice.
(Total 393 Words)
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'third', 'whereas']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.251152073733 0.268076937826 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.147465437788 0.116061578633 127% => OK
Adjectives: 0.073732718894 0.0759168565197 97% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0345622119816 0.0366838410393 94% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0253456221198 0.0131127313244 193% => OK
Prepositions: 0.1866359447 0.155750635184 120% => OK
Participles: 0.0529953917051 0.0379272487307 140% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.65491378132 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0138248847926 0.0210936926555 66% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.101382488479 0.0948980150116 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00921658986175 0.00437022459523 211% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0138248847926 0.00967000014798 143% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2245.0 1161.00487805 193% => OK
No of words: 391.0 196.9 199% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74168797954 5.90752243213 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 3.73763899035 119% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.314578005115 0.337110787985 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.227621483376 0.247514529752 92% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.166240409207 0.171178102325 97% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0869565217391 0.112407865282 77% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65491378132 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 106.607317073 156% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.424552429668 0.546246751206 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 44.5012351637 49.3433353143 90% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 8.93414634146 190% => Less sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0094962315 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2986535724 42.9750493124 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.058823529 135.714022679 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.0094962315 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.352941176471 0.689975730869 51% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 3.84146341463 182% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 45.7621483376 47.7609492067 96% => OK
Elegance: 2.36666666667 2.94281807926 80% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.479906670881 0.418131533498 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.197645302614 0.181151798455 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.120880602017 0.0850326197045 142% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.716265597772 0.706616315825 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.165442753407 0.157042692854 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.23483887196 0.228904883108 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130109331998 0.108899403657 119% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.37469632338 0.367819155151 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.201481033958 0.0812612215331 248% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292852039926 0.316326947829 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152063927531 0.0921553760075 165% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70731707317 27% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.14146341463 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.08536585366 343% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.16585365854 32% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 0.956097560976 209% => OK
Neutral topic words: 11.0 3.02926829268 363% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 7.1512195122 196% => OK
--------------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 7.5 Out of 9