The bar chart shows the average number of viewers of a late night British television program from the years 2000-2015.
The bar graph illustrates the typical number of watchers of a late-night Britain tv program in England, Ireland, and Scotland for over 15 years.
Overall, amongst the 3 cities that mentioned which dramatically declined its figures of average viewers, Scotland significantly went up throughout the years.
By far, England marked the highest typical amount of viewers of all categories presented with recorded data from 50 thousand in 2000 and increased by 5 thousand in the past 5 years . However, as the years went by, the values dramatically decreased and reached to about 3 thousand as the lowest point. Similarly, Ireland the second-largest from the start of the year accounted for just above 45 thousand and the trend went down suddenly year on year and finished approximately just below 15 thousand in the end year.
In Scotland, the average amount of viewers began with the smallest figure around 3 thousand and significantly jumped up to around 33 thousand as its highest point in 2015.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...reased by 5 thousand in the past 5 years . However, as the years went by, the valu...
^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thousand as the lowest point. Similarly, Ireland the second-largest from the star...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, similarly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13496932515 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88889929616 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601226993865 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.6358540856 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.5 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213638675916 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962828518814 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510988843782 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111229291178 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564228845086 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.