The charts below show the primary uses of internet in Japan in the years from 1995 to 2005.
The pie graphs illustrate the main functions of the internet in Japan for over 10 years, starting in 1995.
Overall, more people in Japan widely used the internet for work and studies and continued even more in 2005, whereas communication and entertainment significantly declined at a minimal level.
Japan's internet was mainly for work in the year 1995 accounted for just over a fifth and dramatically increased to nearly half of the overall in the end year,2005. Similarly, there was a significant decrease in the figure for studies with recorded data from just over a quarter to 36% in 2005.
Meanwhile, communication used of the internet started from nearly a fifth and modestly decreased to just under a tenth in the end, which marked as the lowest figure of all the given categories. Also, with the same trend that fell, the entertainment began only to nearly a quarter and slightly went down to around just over a tenth in 2005.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95625 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78662402155 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55625 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5687081353 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.166666667 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245882266122 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124443932661 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588103468092 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149909626001 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376980481812 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.